4 Comments
User's avatar
Milos's avatar

VET: I don't like them buying assets with debt, and then selling some legacy assets to repay it. The sale usually comes with an impairment, suposedly non-cash, but that cash was spent in the original acquisition! I'm afraid we'll see another one when they announce the sale of Saaskachewan assets. I thought we won't go below 8, but here we are at 7.4.

Expand full comment
Unemployed Value Degen's avatar

Allegedly the acquisition was opportunistic, which could be true due to contiguous acreage. Or management could be empire-building liars. Time will tell.

Expand full comment
Edward Lee's avatar

Is $VET a buy at these levels?

Expand full comment
Unemployed Value Degen's avatar

I absolutely think yes. The big risk is management continuing to do acquisitions instead of buybacks. But even then, cashflow per share increases.

Expand full comment